May 29, 2008 | Thursday...2:53 pm

Weekly Geeks: Sometimes, The Movie Is Better

Jump to Comments

Although Dewey gave many varied examples in this week’s Weekly Geeks prompt, I’m going with an obvious and, to me, the most familiar method of storytelling – movies, of course. Like many people in these modern times, I was watching movies before I ever learned how to read. (The first film I ever saw in the cinema was Supergirl, which, at the time, seemed supremely magical, although that youthful assessment failed to stand the test of time.)

Aside from books, movies are one of my favorite distractions, and dissecting books adapted to film goes hand-in-hand with that. Sometimes, my two great loves glean fantastic results (The Lord of the Rings Trilogy, anyone?) and sometimes not (The Seeker still makes me violent when I’m reminded of it). Here’s a smattering of my favorite adaptations:

Fight ClubFight Club
Let it be known that I am not a fan of Chuck Palahniuk. I’ve read a few of his books, Fight Club among them, but I’ve never gotten the point. On paper, it reads like every other ranting coffeehouse poet/musician who doesn’t realize that cultivated jadedness is already passe. The film, however, gave me a different experience. The imagery was visceral, not annoying; the dialogue was provocative; and, despite (or is it because of?) the violence, the characters and themes were still relatable. The film gave me a new appreciation for what Chuck Palahniuk was trying to say, and while I’m still not a fan, I’m always excited to hear about (thus far nonexistent) films based on his work.

Children of Men Children of Men
Children of Men is based on PD James’ novel of the same name(well, except the novel was called The Children of Men, if you’re going to be picky) , although the film makes so many changes that the two works are pretty much independent of each other. As directed by Alfonso Cuaron, Children of Men becomes a scathing commentary on the state of politics, world trade, and war, but Mr. Cuaron doesn’t forget about the strength of human relationships, as illuminated in one of the film’s most poignant scenes, when Jasper, with humor and resignation, makes the ultimate sacrifice for Theo and Kee.

A lot of the time, changes to any written work don’t translate well to film or are met with protest by readers. But that sentiment doesn’t apply to Children of Men. In fact, I’ll just go ahead and say it. Forget about the book. The movie was better.

Great ExpectationsGreat Expectations
The last adaptation to round out my list (although, really, I could go on and on and on and on) is Great Expectations, which was also directed by the prolific Alfonso Cuaron. I’m not saying that Mr. Cuaron’s film is better than Dickens’ novel; I just think that Mr. Cuaron did all non-readers a great service by making a film that reinforces Great Expectations‘ universality.

In this retelling, England has been replaced with Florida. Pip has been renamed Finn and moves to New York to become an artist. (The wonderful Francesco Clemente supplied the paintings and drawings for the film.) Estella is still the elusive object of desire, and Ms. Havisham becomes Ms. Dinsmoor, who, in the film, plays Besame Mucho on an endless loop and generally acts like a loopy old bat. Despite the change in characters and setting, much of the oppressive, Gothic atmosphere of the source material is retained in the film. I’ve seen this film well over a dozen times, and it still destroys me each time.

There are a few other adaptations that come to mind, but those are my top three. That may change, however, what with Twilight coming out this year (I’m still reading it, but I’ve already become a full-blown Edward Cullen whore, despite my age and better judgment) and Alfonso Cuaron’s vision of The History of Love coming out next year. Anyway, this is a personal and subjective list, and one that I’m always willing to add to, so I’d be happy to hear your film recommendations. :)

11 Comments

  • Thank you for the recommendations. I haven’t seen any of the films you’ve listed. Great Expectations piques my interest. I agree with you that its possible to like an adaptation even if you don’t like or don’t get the book. My prime example is Apocalypse Now. I love the film but not the book that inspired it. Heart of Darkness just gives me a headache.

  • Great Expectations is one of my favorite movies, and Alfonso Cuaron has become one of my favorite directors as well. He directed an adaptation of The Little Princess and that, too, was an incredible film. He’s very prolific and has yet to disappoint. :)

  • I love that you jumped right out there and said the movie was better. I agree. I tried reading Children of Men after the film but I struggled after about 20 or so pages. (Cannot wait for Breaking Dawn to be published and for Twilight to be released in the cinema!)

  • I’m totally fangirling on Twilight myself. Jeez, I can’t believe I resisted the hype for so long! I’m only Twilight right now, but I’m borrowing all of my sister’s copies of the series to read them in the summer! :)

  • I loved both books and movies of The Lord of the Rings; I thought the ending of Fight Club had much more weight in the film than in the book; I haven’t read the novel of Children of Men, but I found the movie good rather than great; and I’ve never liked Great Expectations.
    Having said that … I love movies. I love any way there is to tell a good story. :)

  • Hello, Maree, thanks for the visit. :)

    I read Children of Men before seeing the film; comparatively speaking, what Alfonso Cuaron did with it blew the source material out of the water. But I am a bit biased with my assessment – I love everything Alfonso Cuaron has done (his Harry Potter film is my favorite) and Clive Owen is, for lack of a better word, hot. :P

    Re: Great Expectations – do you mean the film or the movie? Or is it both? :P

  • I totally loved Children of Men (the movie) and was debating reading the book … now I think I’ll skip it in favor of something else. Thanks!

  • I LOVE the movie version of Children of Men. I was just captivated by that movie. I tried reading the book and maybe because I was expecting it to be more like the movie, I just stopped reading part way through. It just didn’t have the passion and immediacy that drew me into the movie. I think Alfonso Cuaron is pretty much a genius :-)

  • @Kim L: I loved the movie, too, and it really is loads and loads better than the novel. Plus, Clive Owen was in it. Haha. :P

    I also think Alfonso Cuaron is awesome; I honestly can say that I like all of his movies.

  • Great post! I, too, love the movies and agree that Cuaron’s Great Expectations is awesome. I enjoy reading books that movies are based on, and though I prefer to read books first, I don’t mind being inspired to read the book after if I enjoy the story.

  • I agree; I don’t think it’s a given that the book is always better than the movie and/or vice versa. It’s nice to find somebody else who likes Great Expectations; I remember that the film was roundly trashed when it came out, and I never understood that!


Leave a Reply